2026-02-08 08:13:16 by akprasad
This page does not need to be proofread.
<page>
<p lang="sa">१०
</p>
<p lang="sa">are included in this edition are so very corrupt in the
form in which it is presented that they are quite un-
intelligible; perhaps some may say that they should
not have been printed at all. Since other manuscripts
are not available, I thought I may as well include them
in this edition in this form, so that scholars may know
that there is such an Upanisad. In printing the
Upanisads, the same plan of division has been adopted as
in the case of the well-known Minor Upanisads, i.e., the
division into Yoga, Sāmānyavedānta, Vaisnava, Saiva
and Sākta. It is hoped that this edition, in spite of
all its defects, will be of some interest and use for
scholars and students of the history of Hindu religion
and thought.
and thought.</p>
<p lang="en">ADYAR
</p>
<p lang="sa">3rd February, 1933.
</p>
<p lang="sa">C. KUNHAN RAJA,
</p>
<p lang="sa">Hon. Director.
</p>
</page>
<p lang="sa">१०
<p lang="sa">are included in this edition are so very corrupt in the
form in which it is presented that they are quite un-
intelligible; perhaps some may say that they should
not have been printed at all. Since other manuscripts
are not available, I thought I may as well include them
in this edition in this form, so that scholars may know
that there is such an Upanisad. In printing the
Upanisads, the same plan of division has been adopted as
in the case of the well-known Minor Upanisads, i.e., the
division into Yoga, Sāmānyavedānta, Vaisnava, Saiva
and Sākta. It is hoped that this edition, in spite of
all its defects, will be of some interest and use for
scholars and students of the history of Hindu religion
and thought.
and thought.</p>
<p lang="en">ADYAR
<p lang="sa">3rd February, 1933.
<p lang="sa">C. KUNHAN RAJA,
<p lang="sa">Hon. Director.
</page>