2025-04-20 14:32:36 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
१५१
64. (a) Arj, Ravi, Rdr
Ravi, Rdr
Appendix D
चिन्तामोहविनिश्चलेन (b) Arj,
प्रत्याख्यानपराङ्मुखः (c) Arj, Ravi, Rdr
प्रवृत्तोऽधुना ; गन्तुं प्रवृत्तः शठः illustrates the mutual influence
of similar passages; we have the same expression at the end
of the hemistich in 53, and 70. (d) Arj, Ravi निरीक्ष्य
सुचिरं जीवाशया वारितः ; Rdr निरीक्ष्य सुचिरं जीवेशया वारितः
Arj श्वासोत्कम्पिकुचं ; Ravi Rdr श्वासोत्कम्पकुचं .
;
66, (a) Arj, Rar गृहीता धम्मिल्ले सखि स च मया गाढमधेरे ;
this reading heightens the poetic effect with the very fine
figure of speech तुल्ययोगिता
much more than the prosaic
reading of वेम.
68. (b )
जनः प्रियो मे ;
-
प्राणाधिको ;
Arj, Ravi, Rdr
Arj, Ravi, Rdr
one Ms of Arj's commentary gives प्राणाधिपो -
the less usual reading which may have been replaced by
प्राणेश्वरः (c) Arj बत कथं .
69. (a ) Arj, Rdr लोलद्भ्रूलतया ; Arj, Rdr • न्यासेऽवधूतं ;
(b) Arj, Rdr ० स्तद्वृत्तान्त निरीक्षणे
(c) Arj, Rdr कोपा-
ताम्रकपोल भित्तिनि; Arj, Rdr दृष्टया गतः पादयो ०.
•
- we
70. (a) Rdr दृष्टः कातरया दृशा द्रुततरं; b) Arj Ravi, Rdr
पश्चादंशुकपल्लवेन ; in 47 (b) विधृता बाला पदान्ते मया
have a locative; so पल्लवे locative, is better; with the in-
strunental, four participles ( दृष्टा, याचिता, विधृता, आलिङ्गिता )
would be asyndetically joined. (c) Arj, Ravi, Rdr यदा
समस्तमघृणो; with यदा the construction is clear - but that
is no reason why should be considered as secondary as
Fris does.
71. (b) Ravi नयनयोस्ताम्बूलरागोदयः ; अपरः, out of
place, peculiar, seems to be a Lectio Difficilior, and hence
64. (a) Arj, Ravi, Rdr
Ravi, Rdr
Appendix D
चिन्तामोहविनिश्चलेन (b) Arj,
प्रत्याख्यानपराङ्मुखः (c) Arj, Ravi, Rdr
प्रवृत्तोऽधुना ; गन्तुं प्रवृत्तः शठः illustrates the mutual influence
of similar passages; we have the same expression at the end
of the hemistich in 53, and 70. (d) Arj, Ravi निरीक्ष्य
सुचिरं जीवाशया वारितः ; Rdr निरीक्ष्य सुचिरं जीवेशया वारितः
Arj श्वासोत्कम्पिकुचं ; Ravi Rdr श्वासोत्कम्पकुचं .
;
66, (a) Arj, Rar गृहीता धम्मिल्ले सखि स च मया गाढमधेरे ;
this reading heightens the poetic effect with the very fine
figure of speech तुल्ययोगिता
much more than the prosaic
reading of वेम.
68. (b )
जनः प्रियो मे ;
-
प्राणाधिको ;
Arj, Ravi, Rdr
Arj, Ravi, Rdr
one Ms of Arj's commentary gives प्राणाधिपो -
the less usual reading which may have been replaced by
प्राणेश्वरः (c) Arj बत कथं .
69. (a ) Arj, Rdr लोलद्भ्रूलतया ; Arj, Rdr • न्यासेऽवधूतं ;
(b) Arj, Rdr ० स्तद्वृत्तान्त निरीक्षणे
(c) Arj, Rdr कोपा-
ताम्रकपोल भित्तिनि; Arj, Rdr दृष्टया गतः पादयो ०.
•
- we
70. (a) Rdr दृष्टः कातरया दृशा द्रुततरं; b) Arj Ravi, Rdr
पश्चादंशुकपल्लवेन ; in 47 (b) विधृता बाला पदान्ते मया
have a locative; so पल्लवे locative, is better; with the in-
strunental, four participles ( दृष्टा, याचिता, विधृता, आलिङ्गिता )
would be asyndetically joined. (c) Arj, Ravi, Rdr यदा
समस्तमघृणो; with यदा the construction is clear - but that
is no reason why should be considered as secondary as
Fris does.
71. (b) Ravi नयनयोस्ताम्बूलरागोदयः ; अपरः, out of
place, peculiar, seems to be a Lectio Difficilior, and hence